On 2005-03-11, an informal announcement of the TROST dissertation project was made on the Professor von Clueless in the Blunder Dome web log [cached .mht]. Here is the text of that note:
On February 1, my proposal for an M.Sc in IT project dissertation was
accepted by my Dissertation Advisor and approved by the Academic
Coordinator of the program. I more or less went autistic and
comatose at that point, although I had prepared a project plan and the
clock began running in relentless one-day-per-day fashion. My
deadline is July 28 and my plan envisions the dissertation being submitted
on July 4 (and already slipping slightly in a replan I am conducting this
weekend). There have been many little stumbles getting started, and
that is something for
at another time.
Today, I want more of the world to know what this is about. That's mostly because I have other items to post about related work and materials that I find in my explorations. It seems useful to establish the perspective that gives rise to my interest.
Why TROST? Well, FROST was already taken and I was grasping at straws. Once I had an acronym that worked in a (puny?) punny way, I held onto it. I even adjusted the name of the project at one point. I was careful to preserve the acronym.
Templates? "Frameworks," "patterns," and "templates" all work. It is not about laws or theories although principles, practices, guidelines, and approaches figure in. I can go either way with "model" but I think I'll save that one from further over-use just now.
Raising? Sure, as in improving, enhancing, enriching, increasing, expanding, and so on. I am looking at the achievement of trustworthiness as a process and a journey, not an absolute result. I do mean continuous improvement along with resilience in the face of setbacks.
Open-System? I had originally said Open-Source here. It didn't take long to realize that there is nothing in my vision for TROST that is peculiarly about open-source development (not to be confused with open-source licensing). I chose open-system trustworthiness in homage to OSI, the Open Systems Interconnection effort that had much to teach us about interoperability and integration as well as network interconnection. I mean open-system in this general way. My attention is on ways in which we can address the trustworthiness of components and their integrations in any open-systems setting.
Trustworthiness? Well, that should be easy. We all know trustworthiness when we see it, right? Maybe not. Starting out, I am looking at trustworthiness in terms of human arrangements for mitigation of the risks of everyday and not-so-everyday life. There is, most of all, the risk of dealing with each other, especially at a distance. I foresee a mapping into trustworthiness projected onto artifacts. I am not willing, at this point, to take my eye off of the ultimately human and social nature of trust and trustworthiness.
Enough blather, where's the code? Uh, yes, this is an Information Technology project and that usually means that something will be built. So, along with some templates and a fair amount of meta-templating too, there is a feasibility demonstration involving honest-to-gosh delivered software. The software will be produced using open-box development of an open-source component. This component will integrate into open-system middleware, ODMA, on the Microsoft Windows desktop.
Here's more based on the definition of TROST as a SourceForge project:
TROST consists of a framework and procedures that are useful for incorporating trustworthiness assurance into the development and delivery of open-system software, demonstrating such assurance, and verifying the assurances.
The goal is to enable adopters of a software product to confidently establish:
I fancy having each installable component be linked with the latest certifications asserted for it, supporting trustworthiness as a dynamic.
I found another interesting domain name. It's for email: firstname.lastname@example.org Not an original device. I couldn't help myself. It's not working yet, so hold back on the spam for now, ok?
On to Literature Search. Now I get to suffer the fear and doubt of every postgraduate student. It's all been done already, it's been shown as not worth doing already; and so on. Yes, I am interested in leads to existing work, proposed work, past work, and the wisdom of the ages. I am. So lay it on me.
created 2005-04-13-13:04 -0700 (pdt) by